Replying to LO23833 --
Dear Organlearners,
John Zavacki <jzavacki@greenapple.com> writes:
>Both theory and practice, as well as entropy, learning,
>thinking, are very well defined. What needs to be
>understood here is that they need more and constant
>explanation until someone hits on the simplest and most
>elegant phrase. Then the theory will be well written.
Greetings John,
Your reply made me think very deep.
Let us assume that eventually "someone hits on the simplest and most
elegant phrase". How will life be afterwards?
Will we still need dialogue since a mere peep at the "simplest and most
elegant phrase" will save us from the poison of misunderstanding? Will the
concept Learning Organisation not become superfluous since everybody will
know exactly what to do to make life heaven for anybody else?
This makes me wonder how much do we confuse our need for a theory and
practise on any domain with our need for a Learning Organisation whenever
involved as individuals with that domain. Are we not trying to replace the
Learning Organisation by trying to create the perfect art (theory and
practice)?
With care and best wishes
--At de Lange <amdelange@gold.up.ac.za> Snailmail: A M de Lange Gold Fields Computer Centre Faculty of Science - University of Pretoria Pretoria 0001 - Rep of South Africa
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.