To become or not to become. LO24471

From: Gavin Ritz (garritz@xtra.co.nz)
Date: 04/27/00


Replying to LO24391 --

Dear At

I am not trying to convince you of anything or have any interest in
changing your mind, this dialogue does not have too much meaning anymore,
it is now become a self reinforcing down ward spiral. Too much personal
stuff now intermingled. This is what I was talking about.

Here is the secret of life, the tension between what we fear (what is
about to be separated from us) and hop- for the ideal. (Be careful with
this it explains all human actions) [Host: "hope" or "hope-for"]

I have read all those theories and those people I quote, I have read
widely on the meaning of their models.

To quote: Deming some Models are useful most are not. I do have a very
clear picture on my model which is used daily with corporations, when it
stops working I will find a better model.

This is not a personal attack on yourself rather on your model, if it is
to stand the test of those dedicated to disproving it, then it is an
appropriate model to use.

Science is dedicated to proving falsehoods not proving truths
[Host: "..proving falsehoods to be wrong, not proving truths right."?]

Good luck with your search for the truth (if that is possible).
Kindest
Gavin

-- 

Gavin Ritz <garritz@xtra.co.nz>

Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>


"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.