Replying to LO25062 --
At wrote:
> SY&SU(B) <==> excells
> SY&SU(A) <==> declines
> [SY&SU(A)](H) <==> excells
Ray adds to his mails:
>"Working for a resident chamber opera center in every city of America of
>100,000 or more"
Ray, while reading At's mail, I have applied what he wrote to a resident
chamber opera center as a SY and a city of America of 100,000 or more as a
SU:
> SY&SU(B) <==> excells
This is how it was in the past.
> SY&SU(A) <==> declines
This is how it became today.
> [SY&SU(A)](H) <==> excells
This is what your mission for the future is about.
At suggests:
>Perhaps the correct answer is that the healing has to be INITIATED in
>both. But with my own insight into irreversible self-organisation, I have
>to stress that the healing has to be INITIATED in the surrounding system
>SU(A) in such a manner that the healing thereafter can proceed in both SY
>and SU(A).
I am wondering who can make such initiative? Must not the initiative come
from outside SY and SU? What would be such an outside position? Now that I
have asked the question, I can also answer it (you can imagine me a sort
of dancing), but I prefer to answer only in a riddle: The place outside
the SY and SU from where healing can be initiated is completely inside the
SY and SU.
As long as one say that this can not be, one is trapped in LEM and won't
be a source of healing. Healing is most complex midwifery: it involves
teaching and leading.
Liebe Gruesse,
Winfried
--"Winfried Dressler" <winfried.dressler@voith.de>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.