Dear Learners,
I used to have a friend who reckoned that 80% plus of the process
structure element of his business was waste, "non value added" in the
latest jargon? If that be so, then of what value is this 'value
statement'.
-- Chaos aka detritus aka noise aka deep taciticity aka off-the-point
posts constitutes "maximum" rich "information"? __
What kind of mental mapping devices will be needed to scale these complex
eddies working upstream-downstream bank to bank, river-surface to
river-bed back and forth all the night-day longshort?
What measures of scale are most value-added in landscapes (inscapes and
outscapes) of the human face and measuring the animating glint in the
eyes, how shall we scale that appropriately? The smaller my
measure-scale-instrument the larger the object of complexity will grow by
coupled degrees of some strange fixity.
I sense the multiple needs of breaking some cherished 'symmetries' as the
move from information conservation ("=") to information creation (">")
proceeds apace, apace, apace Tallyho!!!.
Then when i read that Einstein saw 'genius in the twinkle of the child's
eye' (I) know what he means...
Texts, like complex peopled organizations, are perhaps by dint of
'scalings' and inhering 'levels of taciticity' self organizing, it calls
us back, to iterate and reiterate in order;-) to create movement from 'the
word' : : transevaluating the revaluation of values to a simple
'NOTHING"?
Confusing Love
Andrew.
--Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.