They all Claim to be LOs LO25979

From: Richard Karash (Richard@karash.com)
Date: 01/25/01


Replying to LO25978 --

Charley Bell wrote:
>... it seems as though most of them claim to be "learning
>organizations." Would you happen to know a few organizations/companies
>that have actually adopted learning organizational philosophies in the
>Los Angeles area or in close proximity?

No, I don't have a list.

No company is 100% a learning organization. The question to evaluate is
the depth and breadth of their action in this regard.

For example, in the depth dimension, is it just a superficial approach
(more training) or are they really doing the kinds of things that Senge
describes (personal and organizational capacity building, practing
collective reflection, good systemic understanding, etc.)

On breadth, is it just an empty initiative with no one following? Or is it
actively practiced by one or a few groups? Or more widespread.

   -=- Rick

-- 

Richard Karash ("Rick") | <http://world.std.com/~rkarash> Speaker, Facilitator, Trainer | mailto:Richard@Karash.com "Towards learning organizations" | Host for Learning-Org Discussion (617)227-0106, fax (617)523-3839 | <http://www.learning-org.com>

Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>


"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.