Replying to LO27018 --
This is an interesting development...
Is there then any validity to the GKEC endeavor?
There appears to be a tremendous amount of interest in the project.
I, for one, have expressed an interest and joined the discussion group to
accomplish the stated goals.
I would like to hear from Mr. Swanstrom both here and in the established forum
some form of rectification of this development.
Thank You
Bruce Jones
Staff Development Specialist
Education Dept.
Northwest Texas Healthcare System
Amarillo, Texas
"Mark W. McElroy" <mmcelroy@vermontel.net> on 07/18/2001 01:31:27 PM
>Given the sweeping implications of the press release posted below by the
>group that calls itself GKEC, officials of the Knowledge Management
>Consortium International ( www.kmci.org ) , myself included, took it
>upon ourselves to contact ANSI to learn more about the knowledge
>management standards efforts described by GKEC and the role that GKEC
>claims it has, or will be, securing for itself. The results of our
>inquiry to ANSI reveals that Mr. Swanstrom's claims are a stretch at best
>and that the reality of what's happening at ANSI vis a vis knowledge
>management standards development is a far cry from what was described by
>Mr. Swanstrom's notice to this forum. In the interest of accuracy, I am
>posting ANSI's response to me below:
--"Bruce Jones" <bjones1@nwths.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.