Graham wrote:
> There is an ambiguity in the use of the word "learning" when we speak of
> the "learning organization", and it is well to be aware of it because it
> can cause confusion.
I think you brought up a good point, Graham. In my thinking process, I
had linked learning to the biological phenomenon that sustains
survivability and sustainability. Without learning, one dies prematurely.
I hadn't really thought of it in the context you raised. I was linking
learning organizations to learning organisms.
I agree with the need to choose principle-centered learning as preferred
to the negative examples you provided. These are the principles that I
consider archetypal for generative organizations:
Honor-A sense of, and strict conformity to, what is considered morally
right or due.
Honesty-The presence of probity, particularly the absence of deceit or
fraud.
Integrity-A soundness of moral principle which no power or influence can
impair.
Sincerity-The absence of dissimulation or deceit, and a strong adherence
to truth.
Beneficence-Active goodness or kindness; charity.
Fidelity-Strict observances of promises and duties.
Discretion-The power or right to decide or act according to one's own
judgment or choice.
Foresight-Provident care or provision for the future; prudence;
prevision; prescience.
regards,
Doc
-- Richard C. "Doc" Holloway Thresholds--Human Development and Networking for Learning Organizations LearnShop(tm) Creator and Facilitator P.O. Box 2361, Olympia, WA 98507 Phone: (360) 786-0925 Fax: (360) 709-4361 mailto:olypolys@nwrain.com" You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough." --William Blake
Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>