I've followed this on the periphery, and I'm beginning to wonder.
> Concerned about the heat to light ratio of this thread, Rick writes:
> > [Host's Note: Hmm... Let's step back and notice what's happening here.
> > Notice some of the feelings and how they are expressed after a long
> > exchange which didn't convince either "side" to change their mind. Now,
It seems like most (admittedly, not all) of the discussion has centered
around advocating one or the other positions or perhaps inquiring into one
or the other. After much time, there are still two camps, though, so it
seems unlikely that many will change their minds.
So, how do we learning-org'ers deal with situations like this? (This is a
tickler to provoke some double loop learning discussion on dealing with
_any_ issue where there seems to be entrenched disagreement, not a prompt
to restate reasons for either side on this discussion.)
Maybe there's a lesson here to carry back to the workplace.
Regards,
Bill
-- Bill Harris Hewlett-Packard Co. R&D Engineering Processes Lake Stevens Division domain: billh@lsid.hp.com M/S 330 phone: (425) 335-2200 8600 Soper Hill Road fax: (425) 335-2828 Everett, WA 98205-1298Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>