To link these concepts with the concurrent discussion of the levels of
competence, I have seen two understandings of the unconscious competence
level expressed on the list. One is that the unconscious aspect of the
competence implies a closed and stable system where feedback is not
considered necessary for continued effectiveness and performance. This,
of course, would lead (eventually, if not immediately) to ineffectiveness
in an open and dynamic system such as is typical in any organizational
context. The second understanding of unconscious competence is akin to an
achievement of fluency with the practice. When a level of fluency is
established, the behavior may occur automatically (without any conscious
awareness of the individual aspects of the be havior), but this does not
imply that feedback is disregarded. Rather, I believe, it becomes even
more salient (especially when the feedback shows that the theory behind
the actions is in need of modification, or can not account for the outcome
realized) . This will become immediately relevant to the unconscious
competent person and will cause an immediate reconsideration of their
understanding of their actions and their direction. Look out! Learning is
about to occur!
Just sharing the connections that I have been making.
Jon Krispin
--"Jon Krispin" <jkrispin@prestolitewire.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>