Artur wrote:
>Very, interesting John, but now that Richard enplained the "spiral
>concept", would you agree that what you were talking about can be
>explained in terms of the next iteration of the spiral concept ?.
Yes, but I thought I had in the bit that followed in that message, which
(paraphrased) read:
"Hence, rather than a 5-stage model, I suggest the four stage model
SPIRALS ........... From the level of Uncon Com one moves to either Uncon
Incom or Con Incom (at the next level) The determinant is effective
reflection or the feel for double-loop learning (of Argyris), and through
the loop you go again, perhaps missing the occasional element"
Hey, I can't help living downunder and being behind you guys.
Richard got in ahead of me while I was asleep!!
Cheers,
John Scott
--"John SCOTT" <JLS@mngt.waikato.ac.nz>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>