Eugene Taurman wrote:
> >This is a good description of how some organisations work. But is good
> >for the worker's life and for the organisation's life and for the human
> >race? Or is it just good for the boss's life?
>
> I did not intend this to be a description of what should be only what is.
Perhaps I could re-phrase the question. Is what is, good for the worker's
life and for the organisation's life and for the human race or is it just
good for the boss's life? And, is the answer the same if the boss is an
owner, professional manager in private sector and manager in public
sector?
Roy Benford
Fulmer, UK
[Host's Note: In this thread I hope we'll have both descriptive (i.e.,
what is and how it is) and normative (what we want to see) comments.
...Rick]
--Roy Benford <roy@benford.demon.co.uk>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>