Meneer de Lange
That was an excellent contribution very well put and quite true. In fact
it has never been proven that time exists at all. Time is a total mental
creation of man. There have never been any scientific experiments that
proves time. That is why there is such confusion over it. Because time
can be linear and non linear at the same time, confusing I'm confused too.
I would like to add that their is also a difference between material/
physiological time and mental-emotional time the latter being a great
interest of mine. Mental time indecently can be classed I suppose as
non-linear. There is a direct correlation between time and leadership, for
example a person like Walt Disney lived his reality 50 years ahead of
everyone else and brought it into realty in the present, whilst say a
carpenters time horizon is only two to there months and he brings what he
does into reality. Time and problem solving ability is also related, look
at Einstein. Kindest
Gavin Ritz
Auckland
New Zealand
AM de Lange wrote:
> Your comment concerns a very important question: "Is linearity necessary
> to standardise the measuring instrument for any physical quantity?" Please
> notice that we assumed that what applies to all physical quanties will
> apply to time also as one of them. It is very important to question this
> assumption at some stage. I will not do it in this contribution.
[Big snip of prev msg by your host..]
--Gavin Ritz <garritz@xtra.co.nz>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>