Art
The implication of your comment is ironic indeed: that this list is a
conversation (set of written messages, if you must) ABOUT organisational
learning, out there, but not something we actually pay attention to in
here. Perhaps we have different views about what constitutes the "real
issues".
I also think that the "rule of two feet" that works so very well with Open
Space (where the people and movement in the system are visible to all)
does not usefully translate here into the "well, just hit your delete key"
approach. How present can this LO system be to itself, not least as part
of our learning about LOs?
regards
Peter
PS You were not to know this, but my post was originally direct to Rick,
who asked if he could edit it and forward it on to the list.
[Host's Note: that's correct... Perhaps I should have said so in
distributing Peter's msg. My apologies if I caused confusion. ..Rick]
At 07:20 /15/7/99 +0100, Art wrote:
(big snip)
>If I myself may give a moderating suggestion: why are those moderating
>suggestions sent to the list and not only to the moderator? Can't we go
>back and discuss mainly the real issues (bot theoretical and practical) of
>LOs?
--Peter Fullerton <peterxyz@ozemail.com.au>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>