Replying to LO24860 --
>When that book reflects the rise and leveling of the highest level against all the
>past lower levels, that book is "best" for me. Few of the latest books are
>"better" or "best" books.
Dear At,
I always suspected that best-selling is not necessarily a good
recommendation ;-). Your qualification fit much better.
Now, what would be the top n books coming close to your qualification?
This is a dangerous question, so I should supplement it by asking for the
required background for gaining benefits from reading each.
Hmm. I am afraid that I have asked for the curriculum of many lives of
(rote) learning. I think you better don't answer my question. I will
compile my own list.
Yet...when you write about levels in your qualification, these are not
totally subjective - high and low level should be independably agreeable.
So it may be still a good idea to ask for your favorites? At least it's
about Team Learning, isn't it?
>Would a list of "condensates" to the LO-archive not be fine? Should 100
>of us each produce one condensate, the power of it all will help us
>tremendously.
I would love to post a condensate of Bert Hellinger. Mainly for two
reasons: He is doing authentic work and his work is totally unknown to
most of you. Unfortunately he writes in german language. Does it matter?
If I took the time to compile such a condensate, would someone care to
translate it?
Liebe Gruesse,
Winfried
--"Winfried Dressler" <winfried.dressler@voith.de>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.