Replying to LO25718 --
Peggy Stuart wrote:
>Rather than presuming that all organizations suffer from learning
>disabilities, practitioners should focus on a wellness model, that learning
>process and potential exist in most organizations as social systems."
..................
Talking about "wellness model", I am rather excited about it as I have
made my own conclusion about a functional working model as against the
theoretical model of LO i.e. Aspiration, Collaboration and Dealing with
Complexity. I call this model - "The Hexagon of Life" under LifePlanning
as per
http://www.homestead.com/quasylatic/A_000_listing.html
Pegge Stuart continues to write
>I am not entirely convinced that this is an either/or situation. Maybe I
>should be concentrating on is not only finding ways to help those that
>need to learn how to learn, but also find these social systems to find
>out what and how they are learning?
>Your thoughts would be appreciated!
indicating two foundamental variables to be tackled :
1) Individual learning capability and
2) Social Systems
A typical rational, logical and linear approach will result in endless
debate of either / or, chicken and egg situation.
I tend to see Social Systems stem from individuals as living neclus that
get connected with one another forming a collective sphere of influence.
What are your views?
Regards
QuaSyLaTic
http://www.homestead.com/quasylatic/
--"Andrew Wong" <andrewwhs@hotmail.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.