immutable incommutablis held and beheld LO25739

From: ACampnona@aol.com
Date: 12/01/00

Replying to LO25710 --

Jim and Leo among all dear learners;-)

Jim Vaillancourt wrote in
LO25710
replying to Leo's
LO25614 --

>Leo Minnigh wrote:
>>"Any structure - or better, organisation with a structure - has a becoming
>>history, a present (dynamic) state, and a future. "
>I was struck by the beauty and simplicity of this statement in explaining
>the becoming of structures.
Snip
>-For me, a structure has 'multiple, possible futures'. And I am
>left with the image of a poker player,
SNIP
>The one possible future
>that I was standing in was different than the vision I once had. Because
>as Leo said, the present is dynamic.

Permanence (is) a pattern of changes. (Susanne K Langer)

Or

Cezanne's two peasants in 'The Card Players';-) (in my head;-)

Or

LEP on LEC

Or

"In order to be, man has to overcome human existence, which is (his)
temporality." Arendt.

Or

WATCH [the] SPACE;-)

Be<>holding,

Andrew 

-- 

ACampnona@aol.com

        Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com>
  Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>

"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.