> Dear Andrew,
>
> I thought that you have had now read so much about "entropy
> production" and its ramifications that I would fruitfully connect
> some of your knowledge (tacit?) to it.
SNIP
> But I never intended to "because, because, because". Yet it happened.
> I should have moved form your "artistic world" (a world which I also have
;-)
SNIP
> Perhaps, should you read my explanation
> backwards from the end to the beginning, it would not appear to be so
> much "because, because, because".
>
> Love
>
> At
>
> >Dear At,
> >
> >You wrote in Dialogue, language, learning LO25948,
> >
> >> You will remember that entropy gets produced by entropic force-flux pairs.
>
> >> To become formally aware of an entropic force or an entropic flux, one
> >> must become aware of intensive and extensive properties. To become aware
> >> of an intensive property or an extensive property, one must scale the
> >> system up or down. Those properties which scales as the whole system
> >> scales, are extensive. Those properties which stays the same (or change
> >> far less than the scaling) are intensive. A difference in an intensive
> >> property is an entropic force while a change in an extensive property is
> >> an entropic flux. Now why all this talk?
...snip...
Dear At, Dear Learners,
In getting ahead of your kind reply (pasted above) to my contribution
(pasted below it above) you ask that I read backwards your posting. So, by
and in remaining ahead from behind now At, please re-read backwards my
pasted above message and SEE what is MISSING at that 'end' that 'is
present' formally what was formerly;-) 'tacit' by absence. Possibility
space?
Great Love Hides Great Things
love,
Andrew
--Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.