Replying to LO26588 --
Hello Learners, leaders and raisers,
How could we be wrong, when a leader emerges only in the envisioned needs
of the others? LeaderSHIP is an art, leadership is an attribute -
attributed by the group - and leadership contributes to a group. Is the
attribute attributed by the group artistically or artificially? Perhaps
leading is both. Leadership seems, like learning and changing, a paradox.
likewise,
Jan
ACampnona@aol.com wrote:
> What this told me today is that a Leader (one) doesn't truly exist except
> in the envisioned needs of all others around (the many) and as such he is
> an emergent social property (servant) or phenomenon of the whole (as
> 'leader' as 'attractor'). I could be wrong!
--With kind regards - met vriendelijke groeten,
Jan Lelie
Drs J.C. Lelie CPIM (Jan) LOGISENS - Sparring Partner in Logistical Development mind@work est. 1998 - Group Resolution Process Support Tel.: (+ 31) (0)70 3243475 or car: (+ 31)(0)65 4685114 http://www.mindatwork.nl and/or taoSystems: + 31 (0)30 6377973 - Mindatwork@taoNet.nl
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.