Responding to TQM LO29300

• Next message: Glebe Stcherbina: "Action Learning and Learning OrganizationLO29301293"
• Previous message: Roy Greenhalgh: "TQM LO29299"
• In reply to: Scott Simmerman: "Responding to TQM LO29286"
• Next in thread: Tadeems@aol.com: "TQM LO29285"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Replying to LO29286 --

Egads, Scott, it is great to hear your sensible voice again. Yes, it is
true that as soon as someone says "we did [TQM, Continuous Improvement,
etc]," you know they didn't. There is no endpoint.

Rol

On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Scott Simmerman wrote:

> Hi. Been a while since I contributed as I've been out
> here lurking. But
> always good to see the continued good stuff.
>
> Barry talked about preferring "continuous improvement."
> And I think that valid, for the most part.

-- 
rol@fessenden.net
        Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com>
  Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>

• Next message: Glebe Stcherbina: "Action Learning and Learning OrganizationLO29301293"
• Previous message: Roy Greenhalgh: "TQM LO29299"
• In reply to: Scott Simmerman: "Responding to TQM LO29286"
• Next in thread: Tadeems@aol.com: "TQM LO29285"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.