Measuring (any) learning LO13715

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: J.C. Lelie: "Accidental Adversaries LO13716"
• Previous message: Matthew Beck: "Electronic learning LO13714"
• In reply to: Shun Chou: "Measuring (any) learning LO13702"
• Next in thread: t.struck: "Measuring (any) learning LO13707"
• Reply to [ author only ][ Learning-Org list ]
  

>Maybe this method could work, but it would depend upon the perceived
>fairness and competence the mentor exhibits. There remains an element of
>subjectivity in this method. If you introduce such a system in an
>environment with little trust (many companies nowadays show
>characteristics of a political arena) that subjectivity could cause severe
>problems by enhancing the distrust, dont you think so?

If learning is aquired knowledge in action, what's this big problem with
measuring it?? You either can or cannot do something that you could or did
not do before.

Paul Foley
Director
Kynesis
** orchestrating organisational change**
7 Burnside Road
Glasgow
G73 4RF
United Kingdom
Telephone (141) 634 5423
Fax (141) 634 5220
Email paul@kynesis.co.uk
Web www.kynesis.co.uk/inform

-- 

paul@kynesis.co.uk

     Learning-org -- An Internet Dialog on Learning Organizations
    For info: <rkarash@karash.com> -or- <http://world.std.com/~lo/>

• Next message: J.C. Lelie: "Accidental Adversaries LO13716"
• Previous message: Matthew Beck: "Electronic learning LO13714"
• In reply to: Shun Chou: "Measuring (any) learning LO13702"
• Next in thread: t.struck: "Measuring (any) learning LO13707"