On 9 Dec 99, at 3:02, Bruno Martins Soares wrote:
> If we have a system of communication, where we are trying to create
> movement within the other person's bag of concepts, our best hope of
> avoiding chaos, of controlling the movement, is to control the rhythm so
> that the movement/reasoning we are emiting is in harmony with the
> movement/reasoning the other person is able to process. Thus getting a
> higher chance of communicating.
You may want to look around for something on syntonics, or grab a book or
two authored by Suzette Haden Elgin, who talks about that although I can't
recall spefically which ones of her books. There are a few listed in the
conflict section at: http://book.work911.com
While the work is mostly related to face to face, you might find some
ideas applied to the writing process.
Great topic though.
> This is interesting within the study of writing. For instance, if we get a
> certain amount of information and we can choose between formating it as a
> note/memo or a report, we must observe that the rhythm/speed of a memo is
> much faster than that of a report. Thus the rhythm of processing of the
> reader can be much slower when reading a report and get much higher level
> of understanding even if the language of the memo is clearer than the
> report's.
Concepts I worked with earlier in my career had to do with pacing and
rhythm in speaking to groups. That there was a conceptual pace (the
cognitive demands made upon the audience by the content), and a delivery
pace or a stimulus variation pace, which refers to the number and nature
of the mechanisms put in place to keep attention. We worked out optimal
rhythms for presentation.
Visit the work911.com supersite at http://www.work911.com for work related articles, or to find almost anything including lists
--Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>