Replying to LO24741 --
Greetings At,
Thank you for reflecting on my doubts. It's a kind of support I
acknowledge and appreciate.
you wrote:
>My heart ache with you. May I suggest that you explore how believing
>become.
Thank you again. Is this something new, unusual? This MU-ing (on
motorcycles), this RE-ing (ala Jan), all the sense and the non-sense we
ask ourselves here all the time?
And this is how it goes just because no matter how brilliant the theory -
we apply it on people.
... just as you said:
>I tend to focus on prophecies connecting to the order higher than that of
>believing -- the others sometimes stress me too much.
... want to say rational? scientific? I am with you, colleague ;-) - but
then see what happens: people become even more frustrated at their
working-places (yes, I know, they don't want to change!). Now don't
mistake me with Mother Teresa, not even close - I just ask and ask and ask
because so far I couldn't find any better practice with those failures I
perform here and there in my working environment. And also, to receive
empathy and reflections from co-learners ;-).
>That is why the authentic prophet has to live or to die by his prophecy.
>In ancient times the prophet had to be stoned when the prophecy actually
>proved to become false.
Now you arrived to the "test" I suggested - prophets live and die by their
prophecies - it's the least they can do ;-D. At least, I try.
... and so you:
>If it may be of worth to you, I have found that authentic prophets never
>stop questioning, just as authentic kings never stop commanding and
>authentic priests never stop stating. Should each of us not become
>prophet, priest and king? What about kids, are they not born like that?
Are they not?
>Allow me to help your answering by asking some question or three:
>Who of prophets, priests or kings, in the ancient days, did keep up
>schools most?
Well I have some in my mind: Pythagoras, Plato, ... Let's go back to King
Solomon.
>Did their schooling had any effect on their organisation?
Sure, and in different ways - correlated with the founder.
>Perhaps the wholeness of a prophet and his organisation is part of the
>integrity which you refer to. When we break the monadicity in the
>wholeness, the integrity breaks too. This why we need the associativity in
>the wholeness so as to seek the sureness of the integrity of the prophecy.
>I am deliberately speaking in riddles here, hoping that WD will come to
>your aid.
I won't object to read WD as well, but I happen to like your elegant
phrasing, moreover, I can see all this fractalized (independent on scale)
and find it again and again fascinating.
Peace to All,
Judy
Dr. Judy R. Tal
LCL-Learning Cycles (1999)
+972 3 6997903
+972 54 666294
judyt@netvision.net.il
--Judy Tal <judyt@netvision.net.il>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.