Burke-Litwin Model LO26544

• Next message: Peggy Stuart: "Public Sector Learning Organizations LO26545"
• Previous message: ACampnona@aol.com: "Burning Streams LO26543"
• In reply to: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26518"
• Next in thread: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26574"
• Reply: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26574"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Replying to LO26518 --

Hanching, Edgar, & Sajeela

Thanks for the pointers to literature on the Burke -Litwin model and the
comments.

Personally, I have some reservations because the first bit of the model
(environment, mission, strategy, management practices etc. leading to
organisational climate) is all organisational stuff and the second bit of
the model (work unit climate, individual needs & values, jobs-skills
match, etc ) is all individual stuff. And, I am not sure about the
validity of combining systems at different levels into one model.

If I understand Edgar and Sajeela correctly, the model is good for gaining
some understanding of how things might be working but it does not provide
any levers to pull to get things to change.

Thanks for the help.

Roy Benford
Fulmer, UK

-- 
"Roy Benford" <roy@benford.demon.co.uk>
        Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com>
  Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>

• Next message: Peggy Stuart: "Public Sector Learning Organizations LO26545"
• Previous message: ACampnona@aol.com: "Burning Streams LO26543"
• In reply to: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26518"
• Next in thread: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26574"
• Reply: Sajeela M ramsey: "Burke-Litwin Model LO26574"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.