At 09:17 PM 10/5/98 +0100, you wrote:
>Students are evaluated based on their performance on those activities.
>There are neither test, nor examinations, because the answers to those
>would not be reusable for further learning.
How does this relate to evaluating the teaching method? An organization
that learns evaluates its' methods.
>In the second term, students have a lot of options, and they have to
>select the activities they will do ( and will be evaluated for). They have
>to choose at least two activities from a list that includes :
[Big snip by your host...]
Atur,
These sound like great assignments but they have little to do with a
University becoming an organization that learns. Where do you and the
faculty evaluate how well these methods worked and decide on experiments
in new teaching methods.
Improving is not about activities or evaluating students but evaluations
the methods used to teach and the teachers then trying to find a better
way to impart knowledge.
Just reacting to what I read.
Gene
Eugene Taurman
interLinx ilx@execpc.com http://www.execpc.com/~ilx
What you are is determined by the thoughts that dominate your mind.
Paraphrase of Proverbs Ch 23 vs 7 KJV
--Eugene Taurman <ilx@execpc.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <rkarash@karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>